Like this tool?
Install byteflow.tools for faster startup and offline tool access.
Install guideLike this tool?
Install byteflow.tools for faster startup and offline tool access.
Install guideParse Content Security Policy headers and analyze for security issues.
Parse Content Security Policy strings into readable directives for faster security debugging, policy hardening, and rollout verification.
It breaks CSP headers into directive-level sections for easier inspection and troubleshooting.
It helps identify missing allowlists, invalid keywords, and overly permissive patterns.
It supports secure rollout workflows by making policy diffs and remediation steps easier to review.
Policy header
default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://cdn.example.com; object-src 'none'
Report-only sample
default-src 'self'; img-src * data:; report-uri /csp-report
Legacy policy
script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https:;
Parsed directives
default-src: ['self'] ; script-src: ['self', 'https://cdn.example.com']
Risk hint
Detected unsafe-inline in script-src; evaluate nonce/hash migration path.
Hardening note
Set object-src 'none' and base-uri 'self' where possible.
Directive typo silently ignored
Validate directive names against CSP specification.
Unsafe keywords left in production
Replace unsafe-inline with nonce or hash based policy.
Wildcard source too broad
Limit hosts and protocols to minimum required origins.
Policy differs between environments
Version control headers and compare deployment artifacts.
CSP Parser & Analyzer should be treated as a repeatable validation step before merge, release, and handoff.
Why use report-only mode first?
It surfaces breakage risks before enforcing a stricter policy.
Is unsafe-inline always bad?
It is generally discouraged; nonce/hash approaches are safer.
Can CSP stop all XSS?
No, CSP is a strong mitigation layer but not a complete substitute for secure coding.
How often should CSP be reviewed?
At every major frontend dependency or asset pipeline change.